If you think the US election was more of a selection than an actual voting by the people, please post here.
I am not so political that I would take down the posts like i see in other forums. When ever possible, please provide links with your comments so when they take down the links we still have the evidence.

Thanks to all who post.

Hi everyone and anyone.. Still here I have just been lazy and trying not to get sick.
Unlike other forums where they delete anything the liberals don't like, we don't here.
Free speech should be free speech... at least to the extent the law allows.

Anyways have fun, be happy and stay safe.

..ex

I'm posting this as many people have not heard of Paul Joseph Watson. You can view his youtube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/user/PrisonPlanetLive and it is hilarious. For some it will be offensive, but for many it is a breath of fresh air.


It's nice to see a person who looks at the world as it is, and says it like it is.

By September 10, 2019 9:40 AM EDT
Another investigation into big tech’s business practices has been launched, this time from the states. 
50 attorneys general and 48 states announced a probe into Google on September 9 for practices that “may have led to anticompetitive behavior that harms consumers.” The leader of the bipartisan coalition, Texas AG Ken Paxton, said in his announcement, “We have seen evidence that Google’s business practices may have undermined consumer choice, stifled innovation, violated users’ privacy, and put Google in control of the flow and dissemination of online information.” 

At the same time, nine attorneys general are investigating Facebook. Led by New York AG Letitia James, the probe will look at “Facebook’s dominance in the industry and the potential anticompetitive conduct stemming from that dominance.” 
These investigations are completely separate from the FTC’s investigation into Facebook and the Department of Justice’s investigation into Google. 
Google has been accused of many things, from privacy leaks to election manipulation. Leaks from state that Google plans on preventing President Trump from being re-elected in 2020. 
In an interview with CNBC, Google CEO threatened that Google would willingly take its business elsewhere if regulated by the U.S. government. He said that other countries aspire to be like Silicon Valley, and “support their companies.” He also stated that “You can’t always take for granted that you will be successful.”  
Facebook has also faced accusations of many more privacy scandals, while censoring conservatives on a regular basis in the interest of “safety.” An audit of conservative complaints over Facebook took all of conservatives’ concerns of censorship and dismissed them as “beliefs.”


Can't wait to see a totalitarian group kicked in the nuts.

Amazon last week confirmed that it keeps transcripts of interactions with Alexa, even after users have deleted the voice recordings.

Based on reports that Amazon retains text records of what users ask Alexa, Sen. Chris Coons in May sent a letter to CEO Jeff Bezos, demanding answers.

The Democrat from Delaware asked Amazon to provide answers on how long it stores transcripts, whether users can delete them, why it collects them and how they are used, and whether the company anonymizes customer identity.

“While I am encouraged that Amazon allows users to delete audio recordings linked to their accounts,” Coons, a member of the judiciary committee, wrote in his letter, “I am very concerned by reports that suggest that text transcriptions of these audio records are preserved indefinitely on Amazon’s servers, and users are not given the option to delete these text transcripts.”

In response, Amazon Vice President of Public Policy Brian Huseman revealed that the tech titan keeps transcripts and voice recordings indefinitely, removing them only when “the customer chooses to delete them.”


“When a customer deletes a voice recording, we delete the transcripts associated with the customer’s account of both … the customer’s request and Alexa’s response,” Huseman wrote in a June 28 memo. “We already delete those transcripts from all of Alexa’s primary storage systems, and we have an ongoing effort to ensure those transcripts do not remain in any of Alexa’s other storage systems.

“We do not store the audio of Alexa’s response,” he continued. “However, we may still retain other records of customers’ Alexa interactions, including records of actions Alexa took in response to the customer’s request.”

Transcripts are stored, according to Amazon, to help improve the digital assistant and “provide transparency” about what Alexa thought she heard and how she responded.

If she makes a mistake—like setting a timer for one minute instead of the four I asked for—the Voice History feature allows users to see and hear how Alexa may have misunderstood a word or phrase.

“Providing customers with the transcript also allows [them] to understand and inspect exactly what Alexa is, and is not, recording,” Huseman added.

Interacting with an Alexa skill, meanwhile, is a whole new ballgame, in which the skill developer may retain records of interactions.

As for other types of requests—recurring alarms, annual reminders, calendar events, texts—customers “would not want or expect deletion of the voice recording to delete the underlying data or prevent Alexa from performing the requested task,” the letter said.

These answers, however, do little to inspire confidence in the company for Coons.

“Amazon’s response leaves open the possibility that transcripts of user voice interactions with Alexa are not deleted from all of Amazon’s servers, even after a user has deleted a recording of his or her voice,” the lawmaker told CNET. “What’s more, the extent to which this data is shared with third parties, and how those third parties use and control that information, is still unclear.”

California lawmakers earlier this year introduced a bill that would limit how manufacturers of smart speakers and digital assistants collect recordings.

The Anti-Eavesdropping Act prohibits saving, storing, or sharing of audio recordings without explicit consent from the user.

Should the legislation pass, it would severely handicap services like Amazon’s Alexa, Siri from Apple, and Google Assistant (among a handful of others).

The Golden State is not the first to try to limit digital eavesdropping: Illinois previously attempted to pass a similar law, which Google and Amazon lobbied against.

Bloomberg recently shocked no one with the news that thousands of Amazon employees around the world listen in on Echo owners’ conversations (allegedly to improve the technology).

More troubling is the fact that workers can also access location information of Alexa users and look up their home or office address.

https://www.geek.com/tech/amazon-admits-...y-1794386/

This is a really good read...

seriously...


  adam and eve.pdf (Size: 2.19 MB / Downloads: 3)

Hi, Some cocksuckers are spamming in Cyrillic. So I have been blocking ips and purging the idiots.
So patience would be appreciated.

Last year, my buddy and the families went to Revelstoke BC canada to go on the mountain coaster.
http://www.revelstokemountainresort.com/...in-coaster

This video was taken by my buddy...
the whole thing was a lot of fun..but kind of short....

Please see attached.

Attached Files

  Video-2016-05-29-12-46-43 Revelstoke pipe.MOV (Size: 37.59 MB / Downloads: 1)

And...withYouTube..censoring the video...

Which is why we actually upload the real media...

Please click on the attachment and view with vlc.

Attached Files

  mag.flv (Size: 9.56 MB / Downloads: 2)

And here we have the Pentagon. We all "know" that a plane..BIG plane hit the pentagon right? Well maybe it *cough...wasn't a plane. Maybe it was something else entirely. Lets have a look.

Below we have a cruise missile. Something about this size..or maybe a little bigger would be able to do the job. But There doesn't seem to be any footage....right?